El Salvador vs Ireland: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
0.5098 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
36th
Ireland rank
39th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Ireland
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5098 metric tons per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.1088 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

El Salvador ranks 36th and Ireland ranks 39th of 216 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0.02 metric tons per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0625 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0625 metric tons per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 0.0177 metric tons per square kilometre 0.179 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1614 metric tons per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 0.025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4728 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4478 metric tons per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 0.1061 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8104 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7043 metric tons per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 0.3196 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5696 metric tons per square kilometre 0.25 metric tons per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 0.5654 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5769 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0115 metric tons per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Ireland?
El Salvador, at 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5098 metric tons per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Ireland?
0.1088 metric tons per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Ireland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Ireland rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 36th and Ireland ranks 39th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Ireland: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ireland/">El Salvador vs Ireland: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.