El Salvador vs Low income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
0.062 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
36th
Low income rank
37th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Low income
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.062 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 0.5566 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 10.0 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low income ahead.

El Salvador ranks 36th and Low income ranks 37th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Low income in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Low income Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0153 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0153 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
1980s 0.0177 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0682 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0506 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
1990s 0.025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0438 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
2000s 0.1061 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0458 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0603 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.3196 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0515 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2681 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.5654 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0604 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5051 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Low income?
El Salvador, at 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.062 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Low income?
0.5566 metric tons per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Low income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Low income rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 36th and Low income ranks 37th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Low income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/low-income/">El Salvador vs Low income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.