Eswatini vs Sierra Leone: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
177th
Sierra Leone rank
174th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sierra Leone
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.7 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Eswatini ranks 177th and Sierra Leone ranks 174th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1980s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0036 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Sierra Leone?
0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sierra Leone?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sierra Leone rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 177th and Sierra Leone ranks 174th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sierra Leone: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sierra-leone/">Eswatini vs Sierra Leone: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.