Guinea-Bissau vs Vanuatu: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Vanuatu
0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
184th
Vanuatu rank
187th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Vanuatu
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.3 times Vanuatu's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 184th and Vanuatu ranks 187th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1990s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
2000s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre Vanuatu
2010s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0035 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre Vanuatu
2020s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Vanuatu?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre in Vanuatu as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Vanuatu?
0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Vanuatu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Vanuatu rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 184th and Vanuatu ranks 187th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Vanuatu: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/vanuatu/">Guinea-Bissau vs Vanuatu: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.