Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Moldova: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Moldova
0.4326 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
44th
Moldova rank
43rd

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Moldova
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 0.4326 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.3948 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Moldova's figure about 11.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Moldova ranks 43rd of 47 groups.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0457 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0442 metric tons per square kilometre Moldova
2000s 0.0058 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1563 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1505 metric tons per square kilometre Moldova
2010s 0.0167 metric tons per square kilometre 0.328 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3113 metric tons per square kilometre Moldova
2020s 0.0301 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3701 metric tons per square kilometre Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Moldova?
Moldova, at 0.4326 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Moldova?
0.3948 metric tons per square kilometre, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Moldova?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Moldova rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Moldova ranks 43rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Moldova: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/moldova/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Moldova: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.