High income vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

High income
0.1849 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
28th
Sri Lanka rank
26th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • High income
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1849 metric tons per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 0.7994 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 5.3 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was High income ahead.

High income ranks 28th and Sri Lanka ranks 26th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, High income averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0322 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0322 metric tons per square kilometre High income
1970s 0.0621 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0619 metric tons per square kilometre High income
1980s 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1001 metric tons per square kilometre High income
1990s 0.1054 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0501 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0554 metric tons per square kilometre High income
2000s 0.1259 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0819 metric tons per square kilometre 0.044 metric tons per square kilometre High income
2010s 0.1574 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4096 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2522 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.1861 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8611 metric tons per square kilometre 0.675 metric tons per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, High income or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1849 metric tons per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between High income and Sri Lanka?
0.7994 metric tons per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do High income and Sri Lanka rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
High income ranks 28th and Sri Lanka ranks 26th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/high-income/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/high-income/sri-lanka/">High income vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.