Hong Kong vs OECD members: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
1.96 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
0.27 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
17th
OECD members rank
17th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • OECD members
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.27 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 7.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 17th and OECD members ranks 17th of 216 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 1.2 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 4.85 metric tons per square kilometre 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre 4.79 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 9.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.092 metric tons per square kilometre 8.96 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 8.5 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1293 metric tons per square kilometre 8.37 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 4.45 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1731 metric tons per square kilometre 4.28 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 3.79 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2225 metric tons per square kilometre 3.57 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 3.16 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2711 metric tons per square kilometre 2.89 metric tons per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or OECD members?
Hong Kong, at 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.27 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and OECD members?
1.69 metric tons per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and OECD members?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and OECD members rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 17th and OECD members ranks 17th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs OECD members: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong vs OECD members: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.