IBRD only vs Philippines: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

IBRD only
1.72 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
8 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
9th
Philippines rank
8th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • IBRD only
  • Philippines
02468196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 8 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.72 metric tons per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 6.28 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 4.6 times IBRD only's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 9th and Philippines ranks 8th of 47 groups.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0303 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2418 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2114 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
1970s 0.0599 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4992 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4393 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 0.1403 metric tons per square kilometre 1.61 metric tons per square kilometre 1.47 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 0.3465 metric tons per square kilometre 2.93 metric tons per square kilometre 2.59 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 0.7055 metric tons per square kilometre 6.01 metric tons per square kilometre 5.3 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 1.25 metric tons per square kilometre 8 metric tons per square kilometre 6.75 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 1.63 metric tons per square kilometre 7.8 metric tons per square kilometre 6.17 metric tons per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, IBRD only or Philippines?
Philippines, at 8 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.72 metric tons per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between IBRD only and Philippines?
6.28 metric tons per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Philippines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Philippines rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 9th and Philippines ranks 8th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Philippines: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/philippines/">IBRD only vs Philippines: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.