Iceland vs Low income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Iceland
0.4919 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
0.062 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
40th
Low income rank
37th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Low income
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.4919 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.062 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 0.4299 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 7.9 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low income ahead.

Iceland ranks 40th and Low income ranks 37th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Low income in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Low income Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0153 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0152 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
1980s 0.0043 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0682 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0639 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
1990s 0.0329 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0688 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0359 metric tons per square kilometre Low income
2000s 0.0581 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0458 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0123 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.1303 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0515 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0787 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.4828 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0604 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4224 metric tons per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Iceland or Low income?
Iceland, at 0.4919 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.062 metric tons per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Iceland and Low income?
0.4299 metric tons per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Low income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Low income rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 40th and Low income ranks 37th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Low income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/iceland/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/iceland/low-income/">Iceland vs Low income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.