Iceland vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time
- Iceland
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.4919 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.4535 metric tons per square kilometre.
That makes Iceland's figure about 12.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
Iceland ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 43rd of 216 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 0.0043 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 1990s | 0.0329 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0312 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.0581 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0064 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0517 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.1303 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0235 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.1067 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.4828 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0324 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.4505 metric tons per square kilometre | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Iceland or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Iceland, at 0.4919 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Iceland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 0.4535 metric tons per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
- Iceland ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 43rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.