IDA & IBRD total vs Norway: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

IDA & IBRD total
1.33 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
4.53 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total rank
11th
Norway rank
13th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Norway
012345196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 4.53 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.33 metric tons per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 3.2 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 3.4 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was IDA & IBRD total ahead.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 11th and Norway ranks 13th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, IDA & IBRD total averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0223 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0213 metric tons per square kilometre IDA & IBRD total
1970s 0.0435 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0078 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0358 metric tons per square kilometre IDA & IBRD total
1980s 0.1015 metric tons per square kilometre 0.117 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0155 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.2659 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7334 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4675 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.552 metric tons per square kilometre 1.86 metric tons per square kilometre 1.31 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.971 metric tons per square kilometre 3.53 metric tons per square kilometre 2.56 metric tons per square kilometre Norway
2020s 1.26 metric tons per square kilometre 4.44 metric tons per square kilometre 3.18 metric tons per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, IDA & IBRD total or Norway?
Norway, at 4.53 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.33 metric tons per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between IDA & IBRD total and Norway?
3.2 metric tons per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Norway rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 11th and Norway ranks 13th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Norway: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/norway/">IDA & IBRD total vs Norway: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.