India vs Lower middle income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

India
3.81 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income
0.9968 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
14th
Lower middle income rank
14th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • India
  • Lower middle income
01234196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 3.81 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9968 metric tons per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 2.81 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 3.8 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

India ranks 14th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 216 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0254 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0079 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0175 metric tons per square kilometre India
1970s 0.0712 metric tons per square kilometre 0.017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0542 metric tons per square kilometre India
1980s 0.2121 metric tons per square kilometre 0.046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1661 metric tons per square kilometre India
1990s 0.5348 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1171 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4177 metric tons per square kilometre India
2000s 0.9518 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2652 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6866 metric tons per square kilometre India
2010s 1.8 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5605 metric tons per square kilometre 1.24 metric tons per square kilometre India
2020s 3.33 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9025 metric tons per square kilometre 2.43 metric tons per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, India or Lower middle income?
India, at 3.81 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9968 metric tons per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between India and Lower middle income?
2.81 metric tons per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Lower middle income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do India and Lower middle income rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
India ranks 14th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Lower middle income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/india/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/india/lower-middle-income/">India vs Lower middle income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.