Italy vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Italy
0.4271 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy rank
44th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
41st

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Italy
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0.4271 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.3887 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 11.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 44th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 41st of 216 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0433 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0431 metric tons per square kilometre Italy
1970s 0.1595 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1592 metric tons per square kilometre Italy
1980s 0.3465 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3459 metric tons per square kilometre Italy
1990s 0.6327 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.631 metric tons per square kilometre Italy
2000s 0.6012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0064 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5948 metric tons per square kilometre Italy
2010s 0.5017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0235 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4781 metric tons per square kilometre Italy
2020s 0.4467 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0324 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4144 metric tons per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Italy or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Italy, at 0.4271 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Italy and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.3887 metric tons per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Italy and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Italy ranks 44th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 41st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/italy/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/italy/sub-saharan-africa/">Italy vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.