Japan vs Lower middle income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Japan
2.42 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income
0.9968 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan rank
15th
Lower middle income rank
14th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Japan
  • Lower middle income
01234196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 2.42 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9968 metric tons per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 1.42 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 2.4 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Japan ranks 15th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 216 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 1.22 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0079 metric tons per square kilometre 1.21 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
1970s 2.31 metric tons per square kilometre 0.017 metric tons per square kilometre 2.29 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
1980s 3.3 metric tons per square kilometre 0.046 metric tons per square kilometre 3.25 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
1990s 3.73 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1171 metric tons per square kilometre 3.61 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
2000s 3.5 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2652 metric tons per square kilometre 3.23 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
2010s 2.84 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5605 metric tons per square kilometre 2.28 metric tons per square kilometre Japan
2020s 2.6 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9025 metric tons per square kilometre 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Japan or Lower middle income?
Japan, at 2.42 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9968 metric tons per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Japan and Lower middle income?
1.42 metric tons per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lower middle income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Japan and Lower middle income rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Japan ranks 15th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Lower middle income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/japan/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/japan/lower-middle-income/">Japan vs Lower middle income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.