North Korea vs Singapore: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

North Korea
5.69 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
5.86 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea rank
11th
Singapore rank
9th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • North Korea
  • Singapore
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 5.86 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.69 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 0.17 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was North Korea ahead.

North Korea ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 9th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1728 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1728 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1970s 1.39 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1121 metric tons per square kilometre 1.27 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 6.18 metric tons per square kilometre 1.86 metric tons per square kilometre 4.31 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 6.54 metric tons per square kilometre 4.47 metric tons per square kilometre 2.07 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 4.19 metric tons per square kilometre 7.44 metric tons per square kilometre 3.25 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 4.81 metric tons per square kilometre 7.51 metric tons per square kilometre 2.7 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 5.68 metric tons per square kilometre 6.62 metric tons per square kilometre 0.942 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, North Korea or Singapore?
Singapore, at 5.86 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.69 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between North Korea and Singapore?
0.17 metric tons per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do North Korea and Singapore rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
North Korea ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 9th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs Singapore: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/singapore/">North Korea vs Singapore: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.