Malawi vs United States: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Malawi
0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
0.055 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
105th
United States rank
103rd

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • United States
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0043 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States ahead.

Malawi ranks 105th and United States ranks 103rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and United States in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi United States Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0131 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0131 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0188 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0187 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1980s 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0334 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0318 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1990s 0.0028 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0444 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0416 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2000s 0.0109 metric tons per square kilometre 0.056 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0451 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2010s 0.0629 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0486 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0143 metric tons per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.0829 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0517 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0312 metric tons per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Malawi or United States?
United States, at 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Malawi and United States?
0.0043 metric tons per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and United States?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and United States rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 105th and United States ranks 103rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs United States: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/malawi/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/malawi/united-states/">Malawi vs United States: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.