Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Mauritius
1.18 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
24th
Sri Lanka rank
26th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sri Lanka
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.1957 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Mauritius ranks 24th and Sri Lanka ranks 26th of 216 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.023 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0184 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0563 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0501 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0062 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.1126 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0819 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0307 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.5585 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4096 metric tons per square kilometre 0.149 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 1.19 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8611 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3299 metric tons per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
Mauritius, at 1.18 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9843 metric tons per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
0.1957 metric tons per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 24th and Sri Lanka ranks 26th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sri-lanka/">Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.