Middle income vs Singapore: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Middle income
1.99 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
5.86 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Middle income rank
8th
Singapore rank
9th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Middle income
  • Singapore
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 5.86 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.99 metric tons per square kilometre in Middle income, a difference of 3.87 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.9 times Middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle income ahead.

Middle income ranks 8th and Singapore ranks 9th of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Middle income averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle income Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0266 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0266 metric tons per square kilometre Middle income
1970s 0.0521 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1121 metric tons per square kilometre 0.06 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.122 metric tons per square kilometre 1.86 metric tons per square kilometre 1.74 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.3779 metric tons per square kilometre 4.47 metric tons per square kilometre 4.09 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.8014 metric tons per square kilometre 7.44 metric tons per square kilometre 6.64 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 1.44 metric tons per square kilometre 7.51 metric tons per square kilometre 6.07 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 1.88 metric tons per square kilometre 6.62 metric tons per square kilometre 4.75 metric tons per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Middle income or Singapore?
Singapore, at 5.86 metric tons per square kilometre against 1.99 metric tons per square kilometre in Middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Middle income and Singapore?
3.87 metric tons per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle income and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle income and Singapore rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Middle income ranks 8th and Singapore ranks 9th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle income vs Singapore: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/middle-income/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/middle-income/singapore/">Middle income vs Singapore: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.