OECD members vs Thailand: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

OECD members
0.27 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
1.96 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
17th
Thailand rank
18th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • OECD members
  • Thailand
0123196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.27 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 7.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 17th and Thailand ranks 18th of 47 groups.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0974 metric tons per square kilometre 0.069 metric tons per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre 0.18 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1249 metric tons per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 0.092 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2786 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1867 metric tons per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.1293 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9644 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8351 metric tons per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.1731 metric tons per square kilometre 2.27 metric tons per square kilometre 2.1 metric tons per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.2225 metric tons per square kilometre 2.02 metric tons per square kilometre 1.8 metric tons per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 0.2711 metric tons per square kilometre 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre 1.69 metric tons per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, OECD members or Thailand?
Thailand, at 1.96 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.27 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between OECD members and Thailand?
1.69 metric tons per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do OECD members and Thailand rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
OECD members ranks 17th and Thailand ranks 18th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Thailand: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/thailand/">OECD members vs Thailand: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.