Paraguay vs United States: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Paraguay
0.0509 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
0.055 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay rank
104th
United States rank
103rd

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Paraguay
  • United States
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0509 metric tons per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Paraguay ranks 104th and United States ranks 103rd of 216 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay United States Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0131 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0131 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0188 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0188 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0334 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0334 metric tons per square kilometre United States
1990s 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0444 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0441 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2000s 0.0042 metric tons per square kilometre 0.056 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0518 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2010s 0.02 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0486 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0286 metric tons per square kilometre United States
2020s 0.0431 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0517 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0086 metric tons per square kilometre United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Paraguay or United States?
United States, at 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0509 metric tons per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Paraguay and United States?
0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and United States?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Paraguay and United States rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Paraguay ranks 104th and United States ranks 103rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs United States: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/united-states/">Paraguay vs United States: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.