Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Portugal
0.245 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.2511 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
59th
Solomon Islands rank
58th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Portugal
  • Solomon Islands
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.2511 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.245 metric tons per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 0.0061 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Portugal ranks 59th and Solomon Islands ranks 58th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 5 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0025 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 0.0629 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0627 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.0672 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0668 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.0818 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0435 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0383 metric tons per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.1186 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1815 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0.2224 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3294 metric tons per square kilometre 0.107 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Portugal or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0.2511 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.245 metric tons per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Portugal and Solomon Islands?
0.0061 metric tons per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Solomon Islands rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Portugal ranks 59th and Solomon Islands ranks 58th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/portugal/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/portugal/solomon-islands/">Portugal vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.