Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Rwanda
0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.2511 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
55th
Solomon Islands rank
58th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Solomon Islands
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2511 metric tons per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.053 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Rwanda ranks 55th and Solomon Islands ranks 58th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0041 metric tons per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.0121 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0435 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0314 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 0.071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2291 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 0.2497 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3294 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0797 metric tons per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Rwanda or Solomon Islands?
Rwanda, at 0.3041 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2511 metric tons per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
0.053 metric tons per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Solomon Islands rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 55th and Solomon Islands ranks 58th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/solomon-islands/">Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.