Spain vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Spain
0.4865 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain rank
41st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
41st

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Spain
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.4865 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.4481 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Spain's figure about 12.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.

Spain ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 41st of 216 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1209 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1207 metric tons per square kilometre Spain
1970s 0.3601 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3598 metric tons per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.4852 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4846 metric tons per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.4462 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4445 metric tons per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.5538 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0064 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5474 metric tons per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.573 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0235 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5495 metric tons per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.5337 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0324 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5013 metric tons per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Spain or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Spain, at 0.4865 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0384 metric tons per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Spain and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.4481 metric tons per square kilometre, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Spain and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Spain ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 41st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/spain/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/spain/sub-saharan-africa/">Spain vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.