Uganda vs United Kingdom: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Uganda
0.6482 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
0.769 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda rank
33rd
United Kingdom rank
30th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Uganda
  • United Kingdom
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.769 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6482 metric tons per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.1208 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Uganda ranks 33rd and United Kingdom ranks 30th of 216 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
1980s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0857 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0856 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3918 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3908 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 0.1213 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7368 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6155 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 0.5188 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8779 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3591 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom
2020s 0.6157 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8747 metric tons per square kilometre 0.259 metric tons per square kilometre United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Uganda or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 0.769 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.6482 metric tons per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Uganda and United Kingdom?
0.1208 metric tons per square kilometre, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and United Kingdom?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Uganda and United Kingdom rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Uganda ranks 33rd and United Kingdom ranks 30th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs United Kingdom: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/uganda/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/uganda/united-kingdom/">Uganda vs United Kingdom: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.