Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
38th
Sri Lanka rank
39th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Sri Lanka
00000196019922024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 2.6 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 47 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1980s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
1990s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
2000s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
2010s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka
2020s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sri Lanka?
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sri Lanka?
37 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Sri Lanka rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/sri-lanka/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Sri Lanka: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 14,318 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.