Late-demographic dividend vs Zambia: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP

Late-demographic dividend
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zambia
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Late-demographic dividend rank
12th
Zambia rank
14th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Zambia
000000196019922024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 14th of 47 groups.

Late-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1970s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1980s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1990s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2000s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2010s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2020s 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of gdp, Late-demographic dividend or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP against 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of gdp between Late-demographic dividend and Zambia?
0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Zambia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Zambia rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of gdp?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 14th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Zambia: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/zambia/">Late-demographic dividend vs Zambia: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per unit of GDP
Unit
metric tons per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 14,318 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.