Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Australia and New Zealand: Arable land — Area, annual growth rate
Arable land — Area, annual growth rate over time
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
- Australia and New Zealand
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.0063 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.0063 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 42nd and Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st of 233 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 2 and Australia and New Zealand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha | Australia and New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 % change on previous year | 4.04 % change on previous year | 4.04 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | -0.9675 % change on previous year | 0.9675 % change on previous year | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 1980s | 0 % change on previous year | 0.2809 % change on previous year | 0.2809 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1990s | 8.33 % change on previous year | 2.89 % change on previous year | 5.45 % change on previous year | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2000s | 0 % change on previous year | 1.85 % change on previous year | 1.85 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0 % change on previous year | 0.43 % change on previous year | 0.43 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land — area, annual growth rate, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Australia and New Zealand?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0.0063 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arable land — area, annual growth rate between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Australia and New Zealand?
- 0.0063 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Australia and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for arable land — area, annual growth rate?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 42nd and Australia and New Zealand ranks 41st of 233 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Arable land — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.