Canada vs Latvia: Arable land — Area, per capita
Canada
0.0009 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0007 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Canada rank
4th
Latvia rank
7th
Arable land — Area, per capita over time
- Canada
- Latvia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0.0009 1000 ha per person against 0.0007 1000 ha per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0002 1000 ha per person.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 4th and Latvia ranks 7th of 184 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 1000 ha per person | 0.0005 1000 ha per person | 0.0009 1000 ha per person | Canada |
| 2000s | 0.0012 1000 ha per person | 0.0005 1000 ha per person | 0.0008 1000 ha per person | Canada |
| 2010s | 0.0011 1000 ha per person | 0.0006 1000 ha per person | 0.0004 1000 ha per person | Canada |
| 2020s | 0.001 1000 ha per person | 0.0007 1000 ha per person | 0.0003 1000 ha per person | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land — area, per capita, Canada or Latvia?
- Canada, at 0.0009 1000 ha per person against 0.0007 1000 ha per person in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Canada and Latvia?
- 0.0002 1000 ha per person, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Latvia rank globally for arable land — area, per capita?
- Canada ranks 4th and Latvia ranks 7th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.