Chile vs Georgia: Arable land — Area, per capita
Chile
0.0001 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Georgia
0.0001 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
119th
Georgia rank
118th
Arable land — Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.0001 1000 ha per person against 0.0001 1000 ha per person in Chile, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 119th and Georgia ranks 118th of 184 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land — area, per capita, Chile or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0.0001 1000 ha per person against 0.0001 1000 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Chile and Georgia?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for arable land — area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 119th and Georgia ranks 118th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.