Croatia vs Tunisia: Arable land — Area, per capita
Croatia
0.0002 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0.0002 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
49th
Tunisia rank
46th
Arable land — Area, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.0002 1000 ha per person against 0.0002 1000 ha per person in Croatia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 184 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0003 1000 ha per person | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0003 1000 ha per person | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land — area, per capita, Croatia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.0002 1000 ha per person against 0.0002 1000 ha per person in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Croatia and Tunisia?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Tunisia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Tunisia rank globally for arable land — area, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 46th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.