Which has higher arable land — area, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Grenada?

Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Grenada as of 2024.

What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Grenada?

0 1000 ha per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Grenada?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Grenada: Arable land — Area, per capita

Equatorial Guinea

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Grenada

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea rank

146th

Grenada rank

148th

Arable land — Area, per capita over time

Equatorial Guinea
Grenada

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Grenada, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th and Grenada ranks 148th of 184 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Grenada	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
1970s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
1980s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
1990s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Grenada?: Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Grenada as of 2024.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Grenada?: 0 1000 ha per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Grenada?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Grenada rank globally for arable land — area, per capita?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 146th and Grenada ranks 148th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Grenada: Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/grenada/">Equatorial Guinea vs Grenada: Arable land — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Arable land — Area, per capita
Unit: 1000 ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 10,922 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Arable land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.