What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Malaysia and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 1000 ha per person, with Malaysia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Turks and Caicos Islands?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malaysia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per capita

Malaysia

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Turks and Caicos Islands

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Malaysia rank

150th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

152nd

Arable land — Area, per capita over time

Malaysia
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Malaysia ranks 150th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 152nd of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malaysia	Turks and Caicos Islands	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per capita, Malaysia or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Malaysia, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Malaysia and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 1000 ha per person, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for arable land — area, per capita?: Malaysia ranks 150th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 152nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-capita/malaysia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-capita/malaysia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Malaysia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Arable land — Area, per capita
Unit: 1000 ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 10,922 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Arable land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.