What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe?

0 1000 ha per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Puerto Rico vs Sao Tome and Principe: Arable land — Area, per capita

Puerto Rico

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Sao Tome and Principe

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Puerto Rico rank

158th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

161st

Arable land — Area, per capita over time

Puerto Rico
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 158th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 161st of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Puerto Rico	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Puerto Rico
1970s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Puerto Rico
1980s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Puerto Rico
1990s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Sao Tome and Principe
2000s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Sao Tome and Principe
2010s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Sao Tome and Principe
2020s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per capita, Puerto Rico or Sao Tome and Principe?: Puerto Rico, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per capita between Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0 1000 ha per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Puerto Rico and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for arable land — area, per capita?: Puerto Rico ranks 158th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 161st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Sao Tome and Principe: Arable land — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/sao-tome-and-principe/">Puerto Rico vs Sao Tome and Principe: Arable land — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Arable land — Area, per capita
Unit: 1000 ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 10,922 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Arable land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.