Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0019 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
0.0018 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
151st
Saudi Arabia rank
154th

Arable land — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Saudi Arabia
0.0010.0010.0020.002196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0019 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0018 1000 ha per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st and Saudi Arabia ranks 154th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0013 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0019 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0019 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Saudi Arabia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0019 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0018 1000 ha per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabia rank globally for arable land — area, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 151st and Saudi Arabia ranks 154th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/saudi-arabia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Saudi Arabia: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,763 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arable land — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.