Libya vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre

Libya
0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
162nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
161st

Arable land — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
000.0010.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Libya ranks 162nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 161st of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Libya
2000s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per square kilometre, Libya or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per square kilometre between Libya and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for arable land — area, per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 162nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 161st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/libya/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/libya/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Libya vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,763 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arable land — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.