Norway vs United States Virgin Islands: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre

Norway
0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
United States Virgin Islands
0.0021 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
146th
United States Virgin Islands rank
148th

Arable land — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • United States Virgin Islands
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0021 1000 ha per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States Virgin Islands ahead.

Norway ranks 146th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 148th of 184 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0149 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0126 1000 ha per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1970s 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0143 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0121 1000 ha per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1980s 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0129 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 ha per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1990s 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0094 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 ha per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2000s 0.0024 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2010s 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0028 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2020s 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per square kilometre, Norway or United States Virgin Islands?
Norway, at 0.0022 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0021 1000 ha per square kilometre in United States Virgin Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per square kilometre between Norway and United States Virgin Islands?
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and United States Virgin Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for arable land — area, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 146th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 148th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs United States Virgin Islands: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/norway/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/norway/virgin-islands-u-s/">Norway vs United States Virgin Islands: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,763 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arable land — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.