Philippines vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre

Philippines
0.0187 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0192 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines rank
52nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
50th

Arable land — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Philippines
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0192 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0187 1000 ha per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Philippines ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 50th of 184 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0161 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0279 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0118 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0164 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0065 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0179 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0308 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0129 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0178 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0273 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0095 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0173 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0182 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0186 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.019 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0187 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0192 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per square kilometre, Philippines or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0192 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0187 1000 ha per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per square kilometre between Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for arable land — area, per square kilometre?
Philippines ranks 52nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 50th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/philippines/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-square-kilometre/philippines/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Philippines vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Arable land — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,763 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Arable land — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.