Which has higher arable land — area, per unit of gdp, Bahamas or Turks and Caicos Islands?

Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Bahamas as of 2024.

What is the difference in arable land — area, per unit of gdp between Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP

Bahamas

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Turks and Caicos Islands

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bahamas rank

162nd

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

160th

Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP over time

Bahamas
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Bahamas, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 162nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 160th of 182 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bahamas	Turks and Caicos Islands	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per unit of gdp, Bahamas or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per unit of gdp between Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for arable land — area, per unit of gdp?: Bahamas ranks 162nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 160th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-unit-of-gdp/bahamas-the/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-unit-of-gdp/bahamas-the/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bahamas vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 185 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Arable land — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.