Bhutan vs Latvia: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP
Bhutan
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bhutan rank
64th
Latvia rank
61st
Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Bhutan
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 64th and Latvia ranks 61st of 182 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land — area, per unit of gdp, Bhutan or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arable land — area, per unit of gdp between Bhutan and Latvia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Latvia rank globally for arable land — area, per unit of gdp?
- Bhutan ranks 64th and Latvia ranks 61st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.