Which has higher arable land — area, per unit of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Guyana?

Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Guyana as of 2024.

What is the difference in arable land — area, per unit of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Guyana?

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guyana?

61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Guyana: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP

Equatorial Guinea

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Guyana

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea rank

125th

Guyana rank

126th

Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP over time

Equatorial Guinea
Guyana

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Guyana, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Guyana ranks 126th of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Guyana in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Guyana	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
1970s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
1980s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
1990s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Guyana
2000s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Guyana
2010s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Guyana
2020s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, per unit of gdp, Equatorial Guinea or Guyana?: Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Guyana as of 2024.
What is the difference in arable land — area, per unit of gdp between Equatorial Guinea and Guyana?: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guyana?: 61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Guyana rank globally for arable land — area, per unit of gdp?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Guyana ranks 126th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Guyana: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/guyana/">Equatorial Guinea vs Guyana: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 185 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Arable land — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.