Ireland vs Luxembourg: Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP
Ireland
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ireland rank
156th
Luxembourg rank
158th
Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Ireland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 156th and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 182 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land — area, per unit of gdp, Ireland or Luxembourg?
- Ireland, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arable land — area, per unit of gdp between Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Luxembourg rank globally for arable land — area, per unit of gdp?
- Ireland ranks 156th and Luxembourg ranks 158th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Arable land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Arable land — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.