Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Arable land — Area
Arable land — Area over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 201,554 1000 ha against 31,787 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 169,767 1000 ha.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 64 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 214 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,936 1000 ha | 110,156 1000 ha | 92,220 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 16,277 1000 ha | 115,823 1000 ha | 99,546 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 19,761 1000 ha | 121,502 1000 ha | 101,741 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 19,055 1000 ha | 138,928 1000 ha | 119,873 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 24,958 1000 ha | 157,980 1000 ha | 133,022 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 31,074 1000 ha | 187,314 1000 ha | 156,240 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 31,684 1000 ha | 199,881 1000 ha | 168,196 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher arable land — area, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 201,554 1000 ha against 31,787 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in arable land — area between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 169,767 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for arable land — area?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 8th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Arable land — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.