China vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Arable land — Area

China
109,061 1000 ha
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
202,474 1000 ha
in 2024
China rank
7th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
9th

Arable land — Area over time

  • China
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922024

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 202,474 1000 ha against 109,061 1000 ha in China, a difference of 93,413 1000 ha.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times China's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

China ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th of 248 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 102,185 1000 ha 118,224 1000 ha 16,039 1000 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 98,394 1000 ha 122,968 1000 ha 24,575 1000 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 112,719 1000 ha 127,502 1000 ha 14,783 1000 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 121,538 1000 ha 139,051 1000 ha 17,513 1000 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 120,252 1000 ha 156,721 1000 ha 36,469 1000 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 115,503 1000 ha 188,207 1000 ha 72,704 1000 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 109,211 1000 ha 200,866 1000 ha 91,654 1000 ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — area, China or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 202,474 1000 ha against 109,061 1000 ha in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in arable land — area between China and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
93,413 1000 ha, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for arable land — area?
China ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 9th of 248 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Arable land — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Arable land — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area/china/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-area/china/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">China vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Arable land — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
281 places, 16,508 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.