Cabo Verde vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Arable land — Share in Agricultural land

Cabo Verde
72.5 %
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
17.56 %
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
4th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th

Arable land — Share in Agricultural land over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
20406080196119922024

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 72.5 % against 17.56 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 54.94 %.

That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 4.1 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Cabo Verde has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 46 regions.

Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 58.46 % 10.41 % 48.05 % Cabo Verde
1970s 58.46 % 10.93 % 47.53 % Cabo Verde
1980s 58.71 % 11.78 % 46.93 % Cabo Verde
1990s 65.04 % 14.44 % 50.6 % Cabo Verde
2000s 71.06 % 15.59 % 55.47 % Cabo Verde
2010s 72.03 % 16.84 % 55.19 % Cabo Verde
2020s 72.43 % 17.41 % 55.02 % Cabo Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher arable land — share in agricultural land, Cabo Verde or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Cabo Verde, at 72.5 % against 17.56 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in arable land — share in agricultural land between Cabo Verde and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
54.94 %, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cabo Verde and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for arable land — share in agricultural land?
Cabo Verde ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th of 46 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Arable land — Share in Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Arable land — Share in Agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-share-in-agricultural-land/cabo-verde-2/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/arable-land-share-in-agricultural-land/cabo-verde-2/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Cabo Verde vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Arable land — Share in Agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Arable land — Share in Agricultural land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
267 places, 15,674 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.