Equatorial Guinea vs Montenegro: Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area
Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 17.09 1000 ha against 16.75 1000 ha in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.34 1000 ha.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 197 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area, Equatorial Guinea or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 17.09 1000 ha against 16.75 1000 ha in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area between Equatorial Guinea and Montenegro?
- 0.34 1000 ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Montenegro rank globally for artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — area?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas) — Area from CGLS. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.