Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Asses — Amount excreted in manure

Polynesia
99,645 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
4.19 million kg
in 2023
Polynesia rank
11th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

Asses — Amount excreted in manure over time

  • Polynesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 4.19 million kg against 99,645 kg in Polynesia, a difference of 4.09 million kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 42.1 times Polynesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Polynesia ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 13 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Polynesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 88,099 kg 3.36 million kg 3.27 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 97,168 kg 3.50 million kg 3.40 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 99,645 kg 3.68 million kg 3.58 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 99,645 kg 3.86 million kg 3.76 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 99,645 kg 3.97 million kg 3.87 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 99,645 kg 4.08 million kg 3.98 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 99,645 kg 4.17 million kg 4.07 million kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — amount excreted in manure, Polynesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 4.19 million kg against 99,645 kg in Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — amount excreted in manure between Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
4.09 million kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Polynesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for asses — amount excreted in manure?
Polynesia ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Asses — Amount excreted in manure (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Asses — Amount excreted in manure. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/polynesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/polynesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Polynesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Asses — Amount excreted in manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Amount excreted in manure (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
165 places, 9,444 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).