Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Asses — Manure applied to soils

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
1.67 million kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
10.65 million kg
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
4th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
7th

Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 10.65 million kg against 1.67 million kg in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 8.98 million kg.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 6.4 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 13 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2.22 million kg 3.23 million kg 1.01 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 2.29 million kg 3.40 million kg 1.11 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 2.31 million kg 3.84 million kg 1.53 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 1.68 million kg 4.03 million kg 2.36 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 1.75 million kg 4.89 million kg 3.14 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 1.73 million kg 7.66 million kg 5.93 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 1.68 million kg 10.16 million kg 8.49 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — manure applied to soils, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 10.65 million kg against 1.67 million kg in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — manure applied to soils between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Sub-Saharan Africa?
8.98 million kg, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for asses — manure applied to soils?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 7th of 13 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/iran-islamic-republic-of/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/iran-islamic-republic-of/sub-saharan-africa/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
165 places, 9,444 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).