OECD vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Asses — Manure applied to soils

OECD
803,124 kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
10.65 million kg
in 2023
OECD rank
10th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
4th

Asses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • OECD
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 10.65 million kg against 803,124 kg in OECD, a difference of 9.85 million kg.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 13.3 times OECD's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

OECD ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 120 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 1.58 million kg 3.23 million kg 1.65 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 1.27 million kg 3.40 million kg 2.13 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 1.07 million kg 3.84 million kg 2.77 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 946,010 kg 4.03 million kg 3.09 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 921,422 kg 4.89 million kg 3.96 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 885,290 kg 7.66 million kg 6.78 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 802,410 kg 10.16 million kg 9.36 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — manure applied to soils, OECD or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 10.65 million kg against 803,124 kg in OECD as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — manure applied to soils between OECD and Sub-Saharan Africa?
9.85 million kg, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do OECD and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for asses — manure applied to soils?
OECD ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 4th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Asses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/oecd/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/oecd/sub-saharan-africa/">OECD vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Asses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
165 places, 9,444 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).