Türkiye vs United Republic of Tanzania: Asses — Share in total livestock

Türkiye
0.18 %LSU
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
0.25 %LSU
in 2023
Türkiye rank
11th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Asses — Share in total livestock over time

  • Türkiye
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0246196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 0.25 %LSU against 0.18 %LSU in Türkiye, a difference of 0.07 %LSU.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Türkiye's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.

Türkiye ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 13 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Türkiye averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Türkiye United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 5.53 %LSU 0.8511 %LSU 4.68 %LSU Türkiye
1970s 4.5 %LSU 0.728 %LSU 3.78 %LSU Türkiye
1980s 3.43 %LSU 0.652 %LSU 2.77 %LSU Türkiye
1990s 2.66 %LSU 0.611 %LSU 2.05 %LSU Türkiye
2000s 1.42 %LSU 0.494 %LSU 0.928 %LSU Türkiye
2010s 0.547 %LSU 0.357 %LSU 0.19 %LSU Türkiye
2020s 0.21 %LSU 0.2625 %LSU 0.0525 %LSU United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asses — share in total livestock, Türkiye or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 0.25 %LSU against 0.18 %LSU in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in asses — share in total livestock between Türkiye and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.07 %LSU, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Türkiye and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for asses — share in total livestock?
Türkiye ranks 11th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Asses — Share in total livestock. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Türkiye vs United Republic of Tanzania: Asses — Share in total livestock. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-share-in-total-livestock/turkiye-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/asses-share-in-total-livestock/turkiye-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Türkiye vs United Republic of Tanzania: Asses — Share in total livestock</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asses — Share in total livestock
Unit
%LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
163 places, 9,318 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.