Croatia vs El Salvador: Asses — Stocks
Asses — Stocks over time
- Croatia
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 3,313 An against 3,252 An in Croatia, a difference of 61 An.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 99th and El Salvador ranks 98th of 128 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,564 An | 2,925 An | 3,639 An | Croatia |
| 2000s | 3,609 An | 3,210 An | 398.8 An | Croatia |
| 2010s | 2,762 An | 3,246 An | 484.5 An | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asses — stocks, Croatia or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 3,313 An against 3,252 An in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in asses — stocks between Croatia and El Salvador?
- 61 An, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and El Salvador?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and El Salvador rank globally for asses — stocks?
- Croatia ranks 99th and El Salvador ranks 98th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Asses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).